Air freshener
Wu April 4, 2
U.S. patent number D422,350 [Application Number D/107,232] was granted by the patent office on 2000-04-04 for air freshener. Invention is credited to Henry Wu.
| United States Patent | D422,350 |
| Wu | April 4, 2000 |
Air freshener
Claims
The ornamental design for an air freshener, as shown.
| Inventors: | Wu; Henry (Hsin-Tien, Taipei, TW) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/107,232 |
| Filed: | July 2, 1999 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D23/367; D23/366 |
| Current International Class: | 2304 |
| Field of Search: | ;D23/366-369 ;261/DIG.65,30,DIG.17 ;239/60,211,55 ;422/120,305 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D385344 | October 1997 | Green |
| D398976 | September 1998 | Green |
| 3400890 | September 1968 | Gould |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Bacon & Thomas, PLLC
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an air freshener showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a front elevation view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevation view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left side elevation view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a right side elevation view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a top plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 