U.S. patent number D421,258 [Application Number D/088,494] was granted by the patent office on 2000-02-29 for cordless telephone. This patent grant is currently assigned to Sony Corporation. Invention is credited to Yasuaki Isonaga.
United States Patent | D421,258 |
Isonaga | February 29, 2000 |
Inventors: | Isonaga; Yasuaki (Tokyo, JP) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Sony Corporation (Tokyo,
JP) |
Appl. No.: | D/088,494 |
Filed: | May 26, 1998 |
Current U.S. Class: | D14/147 |
Current International Class: | 1403 |
Field of Search: | ;D14/137,138,140,142,147,148,240,248 ;379/433,434,419,420,428,440 ;455/550-575,90 |
D332785 | January 1993 | Nagele et al. |
D347005 | May 1994 | Suzuki |
D353808 | December 1994 | Taniguchi et al. |
D355912 | February 1995 | Wicks et al. |
D366872 | February 1996 | Nagele et al. |
D368712 | April 1996 | Wicks et al. |
D374666 | October 1996 | Matsumoto |
D380750 | July 1997 | Sato et al. |
D382871 | August 1997 | Nagai et al. |
D384079 | September 1997 | Hung |
D385558 | October 1997 | Liu |
D388432 | December 1997 | Lytle |
D398924 | September 1998 | Shindo |
5461672 | October 1995 | Enokido et al. |
"Sony Style" pp. 266-269 (Apr. 1998).. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.