Seat

Lewis , et al. February 22, 2

Patent Grant D420820

U.S. patent number D420,820 [Application Number D/084,278] was granted by the patent office on 2000-02-22 for seat. This patent grant is currently assigned to La-Z-Boy Incorporated. Invention is credited to Jerry D. Crummel, Jack R. Lewis.


United States Patent D420,820
Lewis ,   et al. February 22, 2000
**Please see images for: ( Certificate of Correction ) **

Seat

Claims

The ornamental design for a seat, as shown and descibed.
Inventors: Lewis; Jack R. (Monroe, MI), Crummel; Jerry D. (Luna Pier, MI)
Assignee: La-Z-Boy Incorporated (Monroe, MI)
Appl. No.: D/084,278
Filed: February 27, 1998

Current U.S. Class: D6/360; D6/334; D6/367; D6/381
Current International Class: 0601
Field of Search: ;D6/334,335,336,360,361,364,367,371,373,381,500,501,502 ;297/232,DIG.7

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
D288505 March 1987 Yamasaki
D325476 April 1992 Wilson, Jr. et al.
D358943 June 1995 Natuzzi et al.
D376265 December 1996 Lewis et al.
D380093 June 1997 Lewis et al.
D381819 August 1997 Lewis et al.
D390372 February 1998 Lewis et al.
D411053 June 1999 Leuois et al.
5485979 January 1996 LaPointe et al.
5630644 May 1997 LaPointe et al.

Other References

La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Burris Series 225 Lounger, La-Z-Boy Sales Catalog Photo--Contermporary Chairs Section, 1987..

Primary Examiner: Watson; Gary D.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.

Description



FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a seat according to our new design;

FIG. 2 is a front elevational view of our new design;

FIG. 3 is a top plan view of the design;

FIG. 4 is a side elevational view of our new design, the opposite side being a mirror image thereof;

FIG. 5 is a rear elevational view of the design;

FIG. 6 is a front perspective view of our new design shown in an alternate position;

FIG. 7 is a front perspective view of our new design shown in an alternate position;

FIG. 8 is a front perspective view of a seat according to a second embodiment of our new design, the difference being primarily a matter of length;

FIG. 9 is a front perspective view of a seat according to a third embodiment of our new design, the difference being primarily a matter of length;

FIG. 10 is a front elevational view of the third embodiment of our design;

FIG. 11 is a top plan view of the third embodiment of the design; and,

FIG. 12 is a rear elevational view of the third embodiment of the design.

The broken the showing of a handle is for environmental purposes only and forms no part of the claimed design.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed