Massager
Taylor April 20, 1
U.S. patent number D408,545 [Application Number D/091,507] was granted by the patent office on 1999-04-20 for massager. Invention is credited to Joe A. Taylor.
| United States Patent | D408,545 |
| Taylor | April 20, 1999 |
Massager
Claims
The ornamental design for a massager, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Taylor; Joe A. (Auberry, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/091,507 |
| Filed: | July 31, 1998 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D24/214; D24/211 |
| Current International Class: | 2803 |
| Field of Search: | ;D24/214,211,200 ;601/134,135,136,137,128,129,123 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| Re19696 | September 1935 | Hemp |
| D272090 | January 1984 | Hosid |
| D366604 | January 1996 | Welch, Jr. |
| 2011471 | August 1935 | Cagrande et al. |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Breston; Michael P.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a massager, showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a back elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a right side elevational view thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a left side elevational view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 