Card carrier
Parad December 29, 1
U.S. patent number D403,152 [Application Number D/056,742] was granted by the patent office on 1998-12-29 for card carrier. Invention is credited to Boris Parad.
| United States Patent | D403,152 |
| Parad | December 29, 1998 |
Card carrier
Claims
The ornamental design for a card carrier, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Parad; Boris (Glencoe, IL) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/056,742 |
| Filed: | July 8, 1996 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D3/247; D3/201 |
| Current International Class: | 0301 |
| Field of Search: | ;D3/201,247 ;150/112,131,147 ;206/37,39,815 ;383/9,38 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D377713 | February 1997 | Chandler |
| 2650444 | September 1953 | Coyle et al. |
| 3299929 | January 1967 | Shagin et al. |
| 5038926 | August 1991 | van der Toorn |
| 5217056 | June 1993 | Ritter |
| 5337813 | August 1994 | Ritter |
Assistant Examiner: Weingart; Monica A.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Parad Law Offices
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of the card carrier showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a side elevational view;
FIG. 3 is a top plan view;
FIG. 4 is a bottom view; and,
FIG. 5 is a rear elevational view.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 