U.S. patent number D393,744 [Application Number D/059,717] was granted by the patent office on 1998-04-28 for holster for a pager. This patent grant is currently assigned to Motorola, Inc.. Invention is credited to Donald Guthan, Tek Choy Kok, Mark Palm, Daniel Troutman, Henry Wandt, Michael Ye, Zhihong Memphis Yin.
United States Patent | D393,744 |
Wandt , et al. | April 28, 1998 |
Inventors: | Wandt; Henry (Boca Raton, FL), Ye; Michael (Beijing, CN), Yin; Zhihong Memphis (Tianjin, CN), Kok; Tek Choy (Singapore, SG), Troutman; Daniel (Boynton Beach, FL), Guthan; Donald (Boynton Beach, FL), Palm; Mark (Margate, FL) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Motorola, Inc. (Schaumburg,
IL) |
Appl. No.: | D/059,717 |
Filed: | August 30, 1996 |
Current U.S. Class: | D3/218 |
Current International Class: | 0301 |
Field of Search: | ;D3/218,226 ;224/236,240,242,250,267,269,904,913 |
D351280 | October 1994 | Pennington et al. |
D354620 | January 1995 | King et al. |
D365676 | January 1996 | Scheid et al. |
D366957 | February 1996 | Scheid et al. |
D368365 | April 1996 | Castilla et al. |
D368582 | April 1996 | King et al. |
5356060 | October 1994 | Kuroda |
5452829 | September 1995 | King et al. |
5537678 | July 1996 | King et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.