Sign holder
Burch April 14, 1
U.S. patent number D393,490 [Application Number D/063,990] was granted by the patent office on 1998-04-14 for sign holder. Invention is credited to Brad J. Burch.
| United States Patent | D393,490 |
| Burch | April 14, 1998 |
Sign holder
Claims
The ornamental design for a sign holder, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Burch; Brad J. (Conroe, TX) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/063,990 |
| Filed: | December 20, 1996 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D20/43; D20/42 |
| Current International Class: | 2002 |
| Field of Search: | ;D20/10,42,43 ;D19/90 ;206/45.25 ;40/642.02,661.08 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D133663 | September 1942 | Beason |
| D313820 | January 1991 | Wright |
| D321446 | November 1991 | Liptak |
| D348485 | July 1994 | Short |
| 4819792 | April 1989 | Christian |
Assistant Examiner: Regester; Jennifer
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Roddy; Kenneth A.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a sign holder showing my new design from the top, front, and one side; and,
FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the sign holder showing my new design from the bottom, rear, and side opposite that shown in FIG. 1.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 