Salt shaker
Trevino, Sr. April 14, 1
U.S. patent number D393,398 [Application Number D/062,627] was granted by the patent office on 1998-04-14 for salt shaker. Invention is credited to Roger Trevino, Sr..
| United States Patent | D393,398 |
| Trevino, Sr. | April 14, 1998 |
Salt shaker
Claims
The ornamental design for a salt shaker, as shown.
| Inventors: | Trevino, Sr.; Roger (San Antonio, TX) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/062,627 |
| Filed: | November 20, 1996 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D7/594 |
| Current International Class: | 0706 |
| Field of Search: | ;D7/591-597 ;D9/503,538 ;222/142.1-142.9 ;215/14,40,43,316 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D291538 | August 1987 | Voigt |
Other References
|
Modern Packaging, Canada Dry bottle p. 98, Oct. 1963. . 1002 Salt and Pepper Shakers, Carey & Tompkins 1995.. |
Primary Examiner: Wallace; Terry A.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Henry; David G.
Description
FIG. 1 is a top view of a salt shaker showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a right side view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a bottom view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a rear view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a front view thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a left side view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 