Vehicle
Skoog March 10, 1
U.S. patent number D391,900 [Application Number D/064,633] was granted by the patent office on 1998-03-10 for vehicle. Invention is credited to Ernest G. Skoog.
| United States Patent | D391,900 |
| Skoog | March 10, 1998 |
Vehicle
Claims
The ornamental design for a vehicle, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Skoog; Ernest G. (Des Moines, IA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/064,633 |
| Filed: | January 7, 1997 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D12/91; D12/86 |
| Current International Class: | 1208 |
| Field of Search: | ;D12/86,90-92 ;296/185 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D84020 | April 1931 | Widman |
| D89787 | May 1933 | Northup |
| D93952 | November 1934 | Theobald |
| D95303 | April 1935 | Andrade |
| D355397 | February 1995 | Verduyn |
| D381294 | July 1997 | Forbes-Robinson |
| D381937 | August 1997 | Forbes-Robinson |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Zarley, McKee, Thomte, Voorhees, & Sease
Description
FIG. 1 is a side elevational view of a vehicle showing my new design the opposite side being a mirror image of that shown;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a top plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 