Carton
Oxley March 3, 1
U.S. patent number D391,481 [Application Number D/056,104] was granted by the patent office on 1998-03-03 for carton. This patent grant is currently assigned to T. J. Smith & Nephew Limited. Invention is credited to Stephen Oxley.
| United States Patent | D391,481 |
| Oxley | March 3, 1998 |
Carton
Claims
The ornamental design of a carton, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Oxley; Stephen (Beverley, GB) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | T. J. Smith & Nephew
Limited (Hull, GB) |
| Appl. No.: | D/056,104 |
| Filed: | June 21, 1996 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| Dec 21, 1995 [GB] | 2052945 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D9/432 |
| Current International Class: | 0907 |
| Field of Search: | ;D9/414,420,423,432 ;206/457,458 ;229/116.1,116.5 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D257861 | January 1981 | Sawa et al. |
| D281668 | December 1985 | Berard |
| D357860 | May 1995 | Lee |
| D358087 | May 1995 | Lowry |
Assistant Examiner: Bondade; Nanda
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Larson and Taylor
Description
FIG. 1 is a front, top and right side perspective view of a carton showing the new design; and,
FIG. 2 is a back, bottom and left side perspective view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 