U.S. patent number D384,163 [Application Number D/051,807] was granted by the patent office on 1997-09-23 for pipette. This patent grant is currently assigned to Eppendorf-Netheler-Hinz GmbH. Invention is credited to Jurgen Holsken, Dieter Husar.
United States Patent | D384,163 |
Husar , et al. | September 23, 1997 |
Inventors: | Husar; Dieter (Hamburg, DE), Holsken; Jurgen (Wilhelmshaven, DE) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Eppendorf-Netheler-Hinz GmbH
(DE) |
Appl. No.: | D/051,807 |
Filed: | March 18, 1996 |
Oct 24, 1995 [XH] | DM/034476 | |||
Current U.S. Class: | D24/222; D24/114 |
Current International Class: | 2402 |
Field of Search: | ;D24/114,222,112,130 ;73/864.01,864.13,864.24,864.16 ;422/100,101 |
D252586 | August 1979 | Kovach |
D260816 | September 1981 | Goldhardt et al. |
D297054 | August 1988 | Williams |
D357324 | April 1995 | Bartal |
D373827 | September 1996 | Polaniec |
5192511 | March 1993 | Roach |
5411489 | May 1995 | Pagay et al. |
5440940 | August 1995 | Wilkins |
5449494 | September 1995 | Seeney |
5454268 | October 1995 | Kim |
5516564 | May 1996 | Roots et al. |
Daigger Lab. Supplies Catalog "Eppendorf-Repeator Pipettor" p. 150 .COPYRGT.1994. . Eppendorf Brochure "Multipette" prior art.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.