Ping pong ball
Lai August 19, 1
U.S. patent number D382,611 [Application Number D/045,828] was granted by the patent office on 1997-08-19 for ping pong ball. Invention is credited to Cheng Lai.
| United States Patent | D382,611 |
| Lai | August 19, 1997 |
Ping pong ball
Claims
The ornamental design for a ping pong ball, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Lai; Cheng (Northridge, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/045,828 |
| Filed: | October 31, 1995 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D21/713 |
| Current International Class: | 2102 |
| Field of Search: | ;D21/203,204,205 ;273/61R,61A,61B,61C,58R,58A,58B,58BA,58J,58D,65R,65EG |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D141546 | June 1945 | Glass |
| D285591 | September 1986 | Peel |
| 1108441 | August 1914 | Hubbell |
| 4305583 | December 1981 | Tandon et al. |
| 4874169 | October 1989 | Litchfield |
| 5038504 | August 1991 | Modigh |
| 5439224 | August 1995 | Bertoncino |
Assistant Examiner: Cohen; Cheri
Description
FIG. 1 is a front view of the ping pong ball of my new design;
FIG. 2 is a rear view;
FIG. 3 is a left side view;
FIG. 4 is a right side view;
FIG. 5 is a plan view; and,
FIG. 6 is a bottom view.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 