Wiper
Chen June 3, 1
U.S. patent number D379,613 [Application Number D/053,915] was granted by the patent office on 1997-06-03 for wiper. Invention is credited to Liang-Yuan Chen.
| United States Patent | D379,613 |
| Chen | June 3, 1997 |
Wiper
Claims
The ornamental design for a wiper, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Chen; Liang-Yuan (Taipei, TW) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/053,915 |
| Filed: | May 2, 1996 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D12/219 |
| Current International Class: | 1206 |
| Field of Search: | ;D12/219 ;15/250.06,250.07,250.35,250.36,250.41,250.42,250.32,250.33,250.01,250.14 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D328061 | July 1992 | Su |
| 4766636 | August 1988 | Shinpo |
| 4976001 | December 1990 | Wright |
| 5048145 | September 1991 | Takahashi et al. |
Assistant Examiner: Martinez; Frank
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Lei; Alfred
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a wiper showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a front side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a right view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a top plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 