Rearview mirror
Snyder November 26, 1
U.S. patent number D375,926 [Application Number D/039,478] was granted by the patent office on 1996-11-26 for rearview mirror. Invention is credited to Carl E. Snyder.
| United States Patent | D375,926 |
| Snyder | November 26, 1996 |
Rearview mirror
Claims
The ornamental design for a rearview mirror, as shown.
| Inventors: | Snyder; Carl E. (Tucson, AZ) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/039,478 |
| Filed: | May 26, 1995 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D12/187 |
| Field of Search: | ;D12/187 ;359/838,844,848,850,855,856,864,866 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D219337 | December 1970 | Monos |
| D285188 | August 1986 | Recht |
| 3501227 | March 1970 | Landen |
| 4245894 | January 1981 | Luchtenberg |
Assistant Examiner: Tabor; Lavone D.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Dutton, Jr.; Harold H. Jamison; W. Charles L. Liebman; Diane F.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a rearview mirror showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is another perspective view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a top view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a bottom view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a left side view thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a right side view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 