Cigar end cutter
Mesco November 12, 1
U.S. patent number D375,576 [Application Number D/047,717] was granted by the patent office on 1996-11-12 for cigar end cutter. Invention is credited to Craig B. Mesco.
| United States Patent | D375,576 |
| Mesco | November 12, 1996 |
Cigar end cutter
Claims
The ornamental design for a cigar end cutter, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Mesco; Craig B. (Ashland, OR) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/047,717 |
| Filed: | December 11, 1995 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D27/195 |
| Field of Search: | ;D27/194,195 ;30/109,113 ;131/253,202,330 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D244390 | May 1977 | Zimmermann |
| D314639 | February 1991 | Rousseau |
| 1294479 | February 1919 | Kollmar |
Assistant Examiner: Regester; Jennifer
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a cigar end cutter showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a back elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof, with the left side elevational view appearing as a mirror image of the right side view;
FIG. 4 is a left end elevational view thereof; and,
FIG. 5 is a right end elevational view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 