Fragrance bottle
Jivago October 29, 1
U.S. patent number D375,047 [Application Number D/044,980] was granted by the patent office on 1996-10-29 for fragrance bottle. Invention is credited to Ilana V. Jivago.
| United States Patent | D375,047 |
| Jivago | October 29, 1996 |
Fragrance bottle
Claims
The ornamental design for a fragrance bottle, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Jivago; Ilana V. (Beverly Hills, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/044,980 |
| Filed: | October 4, 1995 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D9/521 |
| Field of Search: | ;D9/521,559,546,307,300 ;D11/146,143 ;D28/91.1 ;215/382,400 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D91609 | February 1934 | De Botelho |
| D100499 | July 1936 | Leppke |
| D181631 | December 1957 | de Kolb |
| D194812 | March 1963 | Jurutka |
| D207924 | June 1967 | Revillon |
| D318009 | July 1991 | Litlon |
| D324174 | February 1992 | Litlon |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Beveridge, DeGrandi, Weilacher & Young, L.L.P.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevation of a fragrance bottle showing my new design, the rear and side elevations are the same;
FIG. 2 is a top view thereof; and,
FIG. 3 is a bottom view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 