U.S. patent number D374,111 [Application Number D/025,456] was granted by the patent office on 1996-10-01 for articulated interlinked segmented belt. Invention is credited to Daniel A. Wilson.
United States Patent | D374,111 |
Wilson | October 1, 1996 |
Inventors: | Wilson; Daniel A. (Caseyville, IL) |
---|---|
Appl. No.: | D/025,456 |
Filed: | July 1, 1994 |
Current U.S. Class: | D2/633; D11/12 |
Field of Search: | ;D2/624,626,627,633,634,601 ;2/300,308,311,321,338,339 ;D11/12,14 ;24/299,332,343 |
112303 | November 1938 | Huddle |
D140282 | February 1945 | Fischer |
D141170 | May 1945 | Braunstein |
D150801 | August 1948 | Meierowitz |
689764 | December 1901 | Titus |
767941 | August 1904 | Hartung |
784891 | March 1905 | Saart |
1065006 | June 1913 | Sommer |
1720235 | July 1929 | Prestinari |
1751792 | March 1930 | Carlson |
2090789 | August 1937 | Forstner |
2385923 | October 1945 | Klaucke et al. |
2451397 | October 1948 | Marquardt |
2539891 | January 1951 | Carr et al. |
2921115 | January 1960 | Wilson |
2928100 | March 1960 | Gagnon |
3837163 | September 1974 | Fujimori |
4639948 | February 1987 | Adell |
4642982 | February 1987 | Gray |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.