U.S. patent number D370,876 [Application Number D/015,838] was granted by the patent office on 1996-06-18 for automobile body. This patent grant is currently assigned to Chrysler Corporation. Invention is credited to William A. Dayton, John E. Herlitz, Darrel L. Morley, Michael Santoro.
United States Patent | D370,876 |
Santoro , et al. | June 18, 1996 |
Inventors: | Santoro; Michael (Birmingham, MI), Dayton; William A. (Northville, MI), Herlitz; John E. (Farmington Hills, MI), Morley; Darrel L. (Troy, MI) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Chrysler Corporation (Auburn
Hills, MI) |
Appl. No.: | D/015,838 |
Filed: | November 30, 1993 |
Current U.S. Class: | D12/92 |
Field of Search: | ;D12/82-3,86,88-92 ;D21/78 ;296/185-6 |
D347201 | May 1994 | Kaku et al. |
D347805 | June 1994 | Ueno et al. |
Road and Track, Oldsmobile 88 Royale LS, May 1992, p. 74. . Car and Driver, Concorde, Intrepid, Vision, May 1992, p. 67. . Car and Driver, Mitsubishi Galant, Aug. 1992, p. 27. . Car and Driver, Cadillac, middle of page, Mar. 1993, p. 76. . Car and Driver, Buick Park Avenue, Jul. 1991, p. 146. . Car and Driver, Pontiac Bonneville SE, Oct. 1991, p. 61. . Car and Driver, Chrysler Concorde advertisement, Jan. 1993, pp. 8-9.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.