U.S. patent number D370,830 [Application Number D/023,706] was granted by the patent office on 1996-06-18 for ribbed tumbler. This patent grant is currently assigned to Libbey Glass Inc.. Invention is credited to Lorelei K. Wilson.
United States Patent | D370,830 |
Wilson | * June 18, 1996 |
Inventors: | Wilson; Lorelei K. (Toledo, OH) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Libbey Glass Inc. (Toledo,
OH) |
[*] Notice: | The portion of the term of this patent subsequent to June 4, 2010 has been disclaimed. |
Appl. No.: | D/023,706 |
Filed: | May 31, 1994 |
Current U.S. Class: | D7/531; D7/523 |
Field of Search: | ;D7/507,509,510,511,514,515,516,523,524,526,527,529,530,531,533,534,535,536,537 ;220/671,675 ;229/400 |
D7241 | March 1874 | McKee |
D42683 | July 1912 | Anderson |
D45605 | April 1914 | Sanford |
D46646 | November 1914 | Whipple |
D47721 | August 1915 | Haley |
D64368 | April 1924 | Oldham |
D81984 | September 1930 | Kirkpatrick |
D90120 | June 1933 | McNash |
D229007 | November 1973 | Hodges |
Monongah Glass Co. Catalog #261/2, 907 p. 3 (1925). . Monongah Glass Co. Catalog #21/2, 907 (1925). . 400 Tumbler, Lancaster Glass Co Nov. 16, 1925. . Libbey .sup.R Foodservice catalog, p. 10, Rocks(No. 15242), May 1988.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.