Bubble light
Papillon May 28, 1
U.S. patent number D370,290 [Application Number D/037,478] was granted by the patent office on 1996-05-28 for bubble light. Invention is credited to Kenneth C. Papillon.
| United States Patent | D370,290 |
| Papillon | May 28, 1996 |
Bubble light
Claims
The ornamental design for a bubble light, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Papillon; Kenneth C. (Renton, WA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/037,478 |
| Filed: | April 13, 1995 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D26/110; D26/106 |
| Field of Search: | ;D26/102-112,93,94 ;362/410-414,806,260,225,216 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D290885 | July 1987 | Morita |
| 5436814 | July 1995 | Hanley |
Other References
|
Miles Kimball, Fall 1991, p. 8, No. 9753-1 Bubble Lights, (upper right).. |
Primary Examiner: Chin; Kay H.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of the bubble light showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a left side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a right side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a perspective view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 