Massager
Huang April 23, 1
U.S. patent number D369,220 [Application Number D/038,863] was granted by the patent office on 1996-04-23 for massager. Invention is credited to Chien-Ming Huang.
| United States Patent | D369,220 |
| Huang | April 23, 1996 |
Massager
Claims
The ornamental design for a massager, as shown.
| Inventors: | Huang; Chien-Ming (Taipei, TW) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/038,863 |
| Filed: | May 12, 1995 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D24/215 |
| Field of Search: | ;D24/215,214,200 ;601/15,18-21,84,85,94,102,103,112,113,131,134,135 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D331466 | December 1992 | Doria |
| D351474 | October 1994 | Huang |
| 2895469 | July 1959 | Regley |
| 4846159 | July 1989 | Anzai et al. |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Kolisch, Hartwell, Dickinson, McCormack & Heuser
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view from the front, top and left side of a massager showing my design;
FIG. 2 is a front view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a right side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a top plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 