Doll
Decanay March 5, 1
U.S. patent number D367,686 [Application Number D/037,582] was granted by the patent office on 1996-03-05 for doll. Invention is credited to Lolita B. Decanay.
| United States Patent | D367,686 |
| Decanay | March 5, 1996 |
Doll
Claims
The ornamental design for a doll, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Decanay; Lolita B. (North Bergen, NJ) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/037,582 |
| Filed: | April 17, 1995 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D21/627; D21/649 |
| Field of Search: | ;D21/166,155,149,171,184 ;446/369-372,385 ;D11/160 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D67422 | May 1925 | Thompson |
| D218333 | August 1970 | Cummings |
| D265492 | July 1982 | Johanson |
| 5090938 | February 1992 | Reynolds |
Other References
|
Playthings, Aug., 1986, p. 23, "Sneaker Peeker" doll.. |
Primary Examiner: Lieberman; Lucy
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Steinberg, Raskin & Davidson
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevation view of a doll showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a right side elevation view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left side elevation view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a rear elevation view thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 