Air freshener
Rosenschein November 21, 1
U.S. patent number D364,451 [Application Number D/022,715] was granted by the patent office on 1995-11-21 for air freshener. This patent grant is currently assigned to Cedalux, Inc.. Invention is credited to Warner Rosenschein.
| United States Patent | D364,451 |
| Rosenschein | November 21, 1995 |
Air freshener
Claims
The ornamental design for an air freshener, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Rosenschein; Warner (New Hamberg, NY) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Cedalux, Inc. (Millbrook,
NY) |
| Appl. No.: | D/022,715 |
| Filed: | May 11, 1994 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D23/368; D23/366 |
| Field of Search: | ;D23/366-369 ;239/54,34,44 ;422/305,122 |
| 1053096 | Jan 1954 | FR | |||
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Low and Low
Description
FIG. 1 is a side elevation view of an air freshener, showing my new design, the opposite side is identical thereto;
FIG. 2 is a side elevation view similar to FIG. 1, but with the air freshener rotated about its vertical axis through 90.degree.; the side opposite is identical thereto;
FIG. 3 is a top plan view of the air freshener of FIG. 1; and,
FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view of the air freshener of FIG. 1.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 