Baby bottle holder
Goler November 14, 1
U.S. patent number D364,228 [Application Number D/028,114] was granted by the patent office on 1995-11-14 for baby bottle holder. Invention is credited to Clifford Goler.
| United States Patent | D364,228 |
| Goler | November 14, 1995 |
Baby bottle holder
Claims
The ornamental deisgn for a baby bottle holder, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Goler; Clifford (Los Angeles, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/028,114 |
| Filed: | September 7, 1994 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D24/199 |
| Field of Search: | ;D24/199 ;248/102,103,104,105,106 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 2451846 | October 1948 | Love et al. |
| 2733883 | February 1956 | Gourley |
| 3512301 | May 1970 | Kramer |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Vaccaro; Andra M.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front, right, top perspective view of a baby bottle holder, showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a bottom plan view thereof, the top plan view being essentially identical thereto;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view thereof, with the beads inside the transparent portion in an alternate position; and,
FIG. 4 is a side elevational view thereof, the opposite side elevational view being identical thereto.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 