Technology time piece face
Blanchard September 5, 1
U.S. patent number D361,953 [Application Number D/029,807] was granted by the patent office on 1995-09-05 for technology time piece face. Invention is credited to Charles Blanchard.
| United States Patent | D361,953 |
| Blanchard | September 5, 1995 |
Technology time piece face
Claims
The ornamental design for a technology time piece face, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Blanchard; Charles (Wilmington, NC) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/029,807 |
| Filed: | October 14, 1994 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D10/126 |
| Field of Search: | ;D10/1-40,122-132 ;368/223,228-229,232,280-282,285 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 3803831 | April 1976 | Horzick |
| 5199009 | March 1993 | Suast |
| 430100 | Oct 1911 | FR | |||
| 31195 | 0000 | CH | |||
| 47002 | Apr 1909 | CH | |||
Other References
|
European Jeweler--Feb. 1979--p. 77--Watch at center.. |
Primary Examiner: Holtje; Nelson C.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Aquilino & Welsh
Description
The FIGURE is a top plan view of a technology time piece face showing my new design.
The timepiece face is of no appreciable thickness and the rear, not shown, is flat, plain and unornamented.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 