Post puller
Harper , et al. August 15, 1
U.S. patent number D361,248 [Application Number D/022,703] was granted by the patent office on 1995-08-15 for post puller. Invention is credited to Miechel C. Geddes, Randall L. Harper.
| United States Patent | D361,248 |
| Harper , et al. | August 15, 1995 |
Post puller
Claims
The ornamental design for a post puller, as shown.
| Inventors: | Harper; Randall L. (Billings, MT), Geddes; Miechel C. (Billings, MT) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/022,703 |
| Filed: | May 2, 1994 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D8/51; D8/88 |
| Field of Search: | ;D8/51,14,88,89 ;254/30,31,131,132,133 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D312196 | November 1990 | Norona |
| 2532533 | December 1950 | Baldwin et al. |
| 4161310 | July 1978 | Parker |
| 4726565 | February 1988 | Keller |
| 4738433 | April 1988 | Hoff |
| 5022632 | June 1991 | Beideck |
| 5186437 | February 1993 | Scott |
Assistant Examiner: Hyder; Philip
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a post puller showing our new design;
FIG. 2 is a side elevation taken from the right of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a front elevation view thereof;
FIG. 4 i a rear elevation view thereof; and,
FIG. 5 is a top plan view.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 