Brief case
Kumashiro December 27, 1
U.S. patent number D353,713 [Application Number D/011,825] was granted by the patent office on 1994-12-27 for brief case. Invention is credited to Keizo Kumashiro.
| United States Patent | D353,713 |
| Kumashiro | December 27, 1994 |
Brief case
Claims
The ornamental design for a brief case, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Kumashiro; Keizo (Shibuya-ku, Tokyo 150, JP) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/011,825 |
| Filed: | August 18, 1993 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D3/276; D3/900 |
| Field of Search: | ;D3/273,276,900,289,318 ;190/18R,100,109,115,900 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D180237 | June 1936 | Wege |
| D259075 | May 1981 | Solomon |
| D267052 | November 1982 | Rapoport |
| 2067851 | January 1937 | Lifton |
| 2318563 | May 1943 | Smith |
Assistant Examiner: Simone; Dominic
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Armstrong, Westerman, Hattori, McLeland & Naughton
Description
FIG. 1 is a front view of a brief case showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a rear view, thereof;
FIG. 3 is a side view thereof taken from the right side, FIG. 1, the left side being a mirror image thereof;
FIG. 4 is a top view thereof; and,
FIG. 5 is a bottom view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 