U.S. patent number D352,423 [Application Number D/006,470] was granted by the patent office on 1994-11-15 for microwave reheatable container. This patent grant is currently assigned to Dart Industries Inc.. Invention is credited to Douglas M. Laib.
United States Patent | D352,423 |
Laib | November 15, 1994 |
Inventors: | Laib; Douglas M. (Kissimmee, FL) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Dart Industries Inc.
(Deerfield, IL) |
Appl. No.: | D/006,470 |
Filed: | March 30, 1993 |
Current U.S. Class: | D7/538; D7/543 |
Field of Search: | ;D7/500,506,514,515,544,565,584,538,539,540,541,542,543,545,548,544,360,550,354 ;D9/452 ;220/571,501,771 |
D106795 | November 1937 | Ilgenfritz et al. |
D137961 | May 1944 | Kapner et al. |
D144152 | March 1946 | Bach |
D185066 | May 1959 | Clark, Jr. |
D233202 | October 1974 | Chernak |
D234738 | April 1975 | Brandon |
D238237 | December 1975 | Herlow et al. |
D241399 | September 1976 | Christian |
D253574 | December 1979 | Anderson |
D291041 | July 1987 | Grange |
D295819 | May 1988 | Mercadante |
D309554 | July 1990 | Meisner |
D326797 | June 1992 | Pomroy et al. |
D343338 | January 1994 | Bucher et al. |
Casserole Creation By Tupperware (#569).. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.