Spectacles having integral illumination
Cooley , et al. July 26, 1
U.S. patent number D349,123 [Application Number 07/923,737] was granted by the patent office on 1994-07-26 for spectacles having integral illumination. This patent grant is currently assigned to Luxtec Corporation. Invention is credited to William L. Chesterson, Bernard Clark, Denton A. Cooley, Lawrence E. Delaney, Frederick Morris, Peter Vari.
| United States Patent | D349,123 |
| Cooley , et al. | July 26, 1994 |
Spectacles having integral illumination
Claims
The ornamental design for a spectacle frame, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Cooley; Denton A. (Houston, TX), Clark; Bernard (Arlington, VT), Morris; Frederick (Shrewsbury, MA), Delaney; Lawrence E. (Bristol, PA), Vari; Peter (Newtown, PA), Chesterson; William L. (Richboro, PA) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Luxtec Corporation (Worcester,
MA) |
| Appl. No.: | 07/923,737 |
| Filed: | July 31, 1992 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D16/309 |
| Field of Search: | ;351/44,51,83,158 ;D16/102,103,118,119,121 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D178873 | October 1956 | Eloranta |
| D215751 | October 1969 | Castellano |
| D229975 | January 1974 | Klugmann |
| D293919 | January 1988 | Podell |
| D329245 | September 1992 | Duvert |
| 2725462 | November 1955 | Vorgang |
| 3060308 | October 1962 | Fortuna |
| 3410638 | November 1968 | Langworthy |
| 3663099 | May 1972 | Saffir |
| 3745993 | July 1973 | Feinbloom |
| 3912918 | October 1975 | Feinbloom |
| 3947139 | March 1976 | Feinbloom |
| 4086004 | April 1978 | Scrivo et al. |
| 4232934 | November 1980 | Feinbloom |
| 4274128 | June 1981 | Malis |
| 4306779 | December 1991 | Rege |
| 4364645 | December 1982 | Feinbloom |
| 4397523 | August 1983 | Feinbloom |
| 4427284 | January 1984 | Dannatt |
| 4498743 | February 1985 | Feinbloom |
| 4555164 | November 1985 | Feinbloom |
| 4621283 | November 1986 | Feinbloom |
| 4649434 | March 1987 | Weinblatt |
| 4767203 | August 1988 | Zahir |
| 4795235 | January 1989 | Spitzberg |
| 4799793 | January 1989 | Feinbloom |
| 4802756 | February 1989 | Feinbloom |
| 4802756 | February 1989 | Feinbloom |
| 4807985 | February 1989 | Feinbloom |
| 4807987 | February 1989 | Bastable et al. |
| 4834525 | May 1989 | Vansaghi |
| 4859032 | August 1989 | Feinbloom |
| 4863468 | September 1989 | Feinbloom et al. |
| 4929075 | May 1990 | Eliakim |
| 4946257 | August 1990 | Feinbloom et al. |
| 4953695 | September 1990 | Tallman |
| 4973130 | November 1990 | Gernet |
| 4988185 | January 1991 | Feinbloom |
| 5044743 | September 1991 | Ting |
| 5076682 | December 1991 | Pasfield |
| 5087112 | February 1992 | Feinbloom |
| 5090796 | February 1992 | Feinbloom |
| 5129717 | July 1992 | Feinbloom |
| 5162824 | November 1992 | Klemka |
Assistant Examiner: Barkai; R.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Weingarten, Schurgin, Gagnebin & Hayes
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a spectacle frame;
FIG. 2 is a front view of the spectacle frame;
FIG. 3 is the rear view of the spectacle frame;
FIG. 4 is a right side view, the side opposite being a mirror image;
FIG. 5 is a top view of the spectacle frame;
FIG. 6 is the bottom view of the spectacle frame.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 