Fan
Cheslock September 28, 1
U.S. patent number D339,859 [Application Number D/003,112] was granted by the patent office on 1993-09-28 for fan. Invention is credited to Edward P. Cheslock.
| United States Patent | D339,859 |
| Cheslock | September 28, 1993 |
Fan
Claims
The ornamental design for a fan, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Cheslock; Edward P. (West Chester, PA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/003,112 |
| Filed: | December 28, 1992 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D23/382; D23/370 |
| Field of Search: | ;D23/370,382,381,328,335-337,378 ;416/247R,244R ;392/365-369 ;248/676 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D271133 | October 1983 | Pataki |
| D276550 | November 1984 | Kouno et al. |
| 2631217 | March 1953 | Aufiero |
| 2765393 | October 1956 | Theisen |
Assistant Examiner: Lichtenstein; Lisa
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Wobensmith, III; Z. T.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a fan showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 5 is a left side elevational view thereof the right side being a mirror image of that shown.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 