Wire puzzle
Davis , et al. April 20, 1
U.S. patent number D334,952 [Application Number 07/658,561] was granted by the patent office on 1993-04-20 for wire puzzle. Invention is credited to Scott Carver, Tom Davis.
| United States Patent | D334,952 |
| Davis , et al. | April 20, 1993 |
Wire puzzle
Claims
The ornamental design for a wire puzzle, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Davis; Tom (San Diego, CA), Carver; Scott (San Diego, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 07/658,561 |
| Filed: | February 21, 1991 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D21/482 |
| Field of Search: | ;D21/104-107 ;273/153R,154,156,157R,158 ;428/33 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D246922 | January 1978 | Heign |
| D253902 | January 1980 | Schoentog |
| D258601 | March 1981 | Smallwood, Jr. |
| D304045 | October 1989 | Hasegawa |
| 1726952 | March 1929 | Gonzales |
| 4867456 | September 1989 | Weber et al. |
Assistant Examiner: Simone; Dominic
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Logan, II; Charles C.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a wire puzzle showing our new design;
FIG. 2 is a left side elevational view thereof, the side opposite being a mirror image; and,
FIG. 3 is a top plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 