Combined container and closure
Halvorson January 5, 1
U.S. patent number D332,215 [Application Number 07/254,533] was granted by the patent office on 1993-01-05 for combined container and closure. Invention is credited to Thomas A. Halvorson.
| United States Patent | D332,215 |
| Halvorson | January 5, 1993 |
Combined container and closure
Claims
A combined container and closure, as shown.
| Inventors: | Halvorson; Thomas A. (Belle Meade, NJ) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 07/254,533 |
| Filed: | October 6, 1988 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D9/503; D7/511; D9/446 |
| Field of Search: | ;D9/367,390,403,446,434,399,349,355 ;215/1R,306 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D16864 | August 1886 | Hurley |
| D31681 | October 1899 | Miller |
| D278413 | April 1985 | Woodcock et al. |
| D280802 | October 1985 | Cho |
| 3122289 | February 1964 | Prahl |
| 3462048 | August 1969 | Wenchert |
| 3485416 | December 1969 | Fohrman |
Assistant Examiner: Simone; Dominic
Description
FIG. 1 is a front view of a combined container and closure showing my new design, the rear being a mirror image; and,
FIG. 2 is an enlarged top view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 