Aerial toy
Sobel July 14, 1
U.S. patent number D327,921 [Application Number 07/666,685] was granted by the patent office on 1992-07-14 for aerial toy. Invention is credited to Jan M. Sobel.
| United States Patent | D327,921 |
| Sobel | July 14, 1992 |
Aerial toy
Claims
The ornamental design for an aerial toy, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Sobel; Jan M. (Agoura Hills, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 07/666,685 |
| Filed: | March 11, 1991 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D21/443 |
| Field of Search: | ;D21/82,85,86,88,89 ;244/153R,154 ;486/46,48 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D105997 | September 1937 | Moore |
| D238422 | January 1976 | Stults et al. |
| 3594945 | July 1971 | Turney |
| 4568297 | February 1986 | Dunipace |
| 4737128 | April 1988 | Moormann et al. |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Munro; Jack C.
Description
FIG. 1 is a top plan view of an aerial toy showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a side elevational view thereof, the other sides being substantially identical;
FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view thereof taken along line 4--4 in FIG. 1 and shown on an enlarged scale.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 