Wiper blade
Mar July 7, 1
U.S. patent number D327,667 [Application Number 07/528,120] was granted by the patent office on 1992-07-07 for wiper blade. Invention is credited to Yat Mar.
| United States Patent | D327,667 |
| Mar | July 7, 1992 |
Wiper blade
Claims
The ornamental design for a wiper blade, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Mar; Yat (New York, NY) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 07/528,120 |
| Filed: | May 23, 1990 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D12/220 |
| Field of Search: | ;D12/155 ;15/250.35,250.36,250.38,250.41,250.42 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 1641336 | September 1927 | Klapper |
| 67650 | Apr 1986 | JP | |||
| 461560 | Feb 1937 | GB | |||
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Bierman; Jordan B.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a wiper blade showing my new design, the side not shown being identical to that illustrated;
FIG. 2 is an elevation view of either end thereof;
FIG. 3 is an elevation view of either end of a second embodiment of a wiper blade showing my new design; and,
FIG. 4 is a perspective view showing one side of the second embodiment it being understood that the opposite side is the same as the side of the first embodiment shown in FIG. 1.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 