Shoe upper
Hatfield June 16, 1
U.S. patent number D326,953 [Application Number 07/714,733] was granted by the patent office on 1992-06-16 for shoe upper. This patent grant is currently assigned to Nike, Inc.. Invention is credited to Tinker L. Hatfield.
| United States Patent | D326,953 |
| Hatfield | June 16, 1992 |
Shoe upper
Claims
The ornamental design for a shoe upper, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Hatfield; Tinker L. (Portland, OR) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Nike, Inc. (Beaverton,
OR) |
| Appl. No.: | 07/714,733 |
| Filed: | June 13, 1991 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D2/969 |
| Field of Search: | ;D2/264,265,308-314 ;36/45,83,84,89,99-107,112-114,132,136 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D318944 | August 1991 | Lucas |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Banner, Birch, McKie & Beckett
Description
FIG. 1 is a right side elevational view of a shoe upper showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a left side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view thereof; and,
FIG. 5 is a top plan view thereof.
The broken line showing the remaining portion of the shoe bottom in FIGS. 1-4 forms no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 