Table
Mackie June 2, 1
U.S. patent number D326,572 [Application Number 07/374,550] was granted by the patent office on 1992-06-02 for table. Invention is credited to Peter Mackie.
| United States Patent | D326,572 |
| Mackie | June 2, 1992 |
Table
Claims
The ornamental design for a table, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Mackie; Peter (Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, CV31 2NG, GB2) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 07/374,550 |
| Filed: | June 30, 1989 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| Jan 5, 1989 [GB] | 1056137 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D6/688 |
| Field of Search: | ;D6/480,482-489,429-431,449-453,455,345,479,351 ;D21/86 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D155770 | November 1949 | Barathon |
| D236301 | August 1975 | Mudde |
| D274285 | June 1984 | Budde |
| D290318 | June 1987 | Berry, Jr. |
| D296738 | July 1988 | Hubert |
| D298147 | October 1988 | Tesla |
Assistant Examiner: Seeger; Janice E.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Schindler; Edwin D.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a table, showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a side elevational view, the opposite side being identical thereto; and,
FIG. 3 is a top plan view.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 