Insulated cooler
Kahl May 5, 1
U.S. patent number D325,853 [Application Number 07/519,562] was granted by the patent office on 1992-05-05 for insulated cooler. This patent grant is currently assigned to Rubbermaid Incorporated. Invention is credited to W. Henry Kahl.
| United States Patent | D325,853 |
| Kahl | May 5, 1992 |
Insulated cooler
Claims
The ornamental design for an insulated cooler, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Kahl; W. Henry (Wooster, OH) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Rubbermaid Incorporated
(Wooster, OH) |
| Appl. No.: | 07/519,562 |
| Filed: | May 7, 1990 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D7/605 |
| Field of Search: | ;D7/605-608 ;62/457.1,457.2,457.7 ;206/541,545 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D283480 | April 1986 | Bailey |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: O'Planick; Richard B.
Description
FIG. 1 is a right front perspective view of an insulated cooler showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a side elevational view thereof; the opposite side being a mirror image;
FIG. 5 is a front elevational view thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a rear elevational view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 