Plush toy bunny rabbit
Phelps April 7, 1
U.S. patent number D325,232 [Application Number 07/476,653] was granted by the patent office on 1992-04-07 for plush toy bunny rabbit. Invention is credited to Helen A. Phelps.
| United States Patent | D325,232 |
| Phelps | April 7, 1992 |
Plush toy bunny rabbit
Claims
The ornamental design for a plush toy bunny rabbit, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Phelps; Helen A. (Gary, IN) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 07/476,653 |
| Filed: | February 8, 1990 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D21/655 |
| Field of Search: | ;D21/187 ;446/369 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D50223 | January 1917 | Cady |
| D61052 | June 1922 | Shawe |
| D65656 | September 1924 | Kotter |
| D158704 | May 1950 | Witite |
| D276900 | December 1984 | Heap |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Gilden; Leon
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of the plush toy bunny rabbit showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a left side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a right side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a top plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 