Cable vibration damper or similar article
Wright February 25, 1
U.S. patent number D324,204 [Application Number 07/323,608] was granted by the patent office on 1992-02-25 for cable vibration damper or similar article. Invention is credited to Curtis M. Wright.
| United States Patent | D324,204 |
| Wright | February 25, 1992 |
Cable vibration damper or similar article
Claims
The ornamental design for a cable vibration damper or similar article, as shown.
| Inventors: | Wright; Curtis M. (Dundee, NY) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 07/323,608 |
| Filed: | March 8, 1989 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D13/154 |
| Field of Search: | ;174/42,41 ;D13/154,153,157 ;24/573.1 ;D8/356 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 4663496 | May 1987 | Peek, Jr. |
Assistant Examiner: Baynham; H.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Mason, Fenwick & Lawrence
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a cable vibration damper or similar article showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view thereof; and
FIG. 5 is a side view thereof with the opposite side being a mirror image thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 