U.S. patent number D321,889 [Application Number 07/307,595] was granted by the patent office on 1991-11-26 for grass collecting cart for a riding lawn mower. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Murray Ohio Manufacturing Company. Invention is credited to Timothy J. Boesch, Jack M. Boone, Stephen R. Burns, Stuart A. Cook, Jack M. Curtis, Matthew D. Rao.
United States Patent | D321,889 |
Burns , et al. | November 26, 1991 |
Inventors: | Burns; Stephen R. (Duluth, GA), Boesch; Timothy J. (Roswell, GA), Rao; Matthew D. (Alpharetta, GA), Cook; Stuart A. (Norcross, GA), Curtis; Jack M. (Santa Fe, TN), Boone; Jack M. (Brentwood, TN) |
---|---|
Assignee: | The Murray Ohio Manufacturing
Company (Brentwood, TN) |
Appl. No.: | 07/307,595 |
Filed: | February 8, 1989 |
Current U.S. Class: | D15/17 |
Field of Search: | ;D15/14-16,22,23,26 ;56/134,16.7,202,320.1,320.2 ;180/89.1,89.2,900 |
D293683 | January 1988 | Mizushima et al. |
D312260 | November 1990 | Uemura |
4054023 | October 1977 | Carpenter |
4158279 | June 1979 | Jackson |
4711073 | December 1987 | Freier, Jr. et al. |
Country Living, Apr. 1987, p. 71, Snapper Lawn Tractor, upper right. . Simplicity Lawn Care, 1984, cover, tractor bottom right.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.