U.S. patent number D321,556 [Application Number 07/263,127] was granted by the patent office on 1991-11-12 for tub or the like. This patent grant is currently assigned to Kohler Co.. Invention is credited to William C. McKeone, Mary J. Reid.
United States Patent | D321,556 |
Reid , et al. | November 12, 1991 |
Inventors: | Reid; Mary J. (Sheboygan, WI), McKeone; William C. (Sheboygan, WI) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Kohler Co. (Kohler,
WI) |
Appl. No.: | 07/263,127 |
Filed: | October 26, 1988 |
Current U.S. Class: | D23/280.2 |
Field of Search: | ;D23/270-275,276-283,303,304 ;D24/38,36 ;4/538,539,541-544,546,548,549,559,571-579,582-584,589-594 ;128/66,369 |
D32411 | March 1900 | Scott |
D32713 | May 1900 | Bowman |
5709 | 1915 | GB | |||
Four pages from a 1914 Kohler catalog showing "Virginia, Countess, Empress and Czarina" tubs. . Page from a 1914 Kohler catalog showing "Kaiserin" tub. . P. 6-4 from 1986 Kohler catalog showing "Mandalay" spa. . P. 6-14 from 1988 Kohler catalog showing six foot length "Infinity" tub. . Five pages from a 1987 catalog from Tubular Specialties Manufacturing showing rail brackets. . P. 64 from a 1987 catalog from Tubular Specialties Manufacturing showing a ball top rail endpiece.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.