Balloon glider
Lovik June 4, 1
U.S. patent number D317,335 [Application Number 07/325,484] was granted by the patent office on 1991-06-04 for balloon glider. Invention is credited to Craig J. Lovik.
| United States Patent | D317,335 |
| Lovik | June 4, 1991 |
Balloon glider
Claims
The ornamental design for a balloon glider, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Lovik; Craig J. (Custer, WA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 07/325,484 |
| Filed: | March 20, 1989 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D21/440; D21/443 |
| Field of Search: | ;D21/84,85,86,150 ;446/220,222,223,225,226 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D158671 | May 1950 | Kline |
| D162560 | March 1951 | Miller |
| D165649 | January 1952 | Harrison |
| D172002 | April 1954 | Browne |
| D212194 | September 1968 | Asner |
| D260786 | September 1981 | Chaklos |
| D261291 | October 1981 | Wilson |
| D276248 | November 1984 | Gauldin |
Assistant Examiner: Barkai; R.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Cassidy, Vance & Tarleton
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a balloon glider showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 