Vehicle bumper
Riss April 9, 1
U.S. patent number D316,070 [Application Number 07/157,336] was granted by the patent office on 1991-04-09 for vehicle bumper. Invention is credited to Andrew A. Riss.
| United States Patent | D316,070 |
| Riss | April 9, 1991 |
Vehicle bumper
Claims
The ornamental design for a vehicle bumper, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Riss; Andrew A. (Reynoldsville, PA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 07/157,336 |
| Filed: | February 18, 1988 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D12/169 |
| Field of Search: | ;D12/169 ;293/102,106 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D297724 | September 1988 | Helber |
| 3471070 | October 1969 | Olson |
| 3501170 | March 1970 | Da Valle |
| 3606385 | September 1971 | Johannes |
| 3614136 | October 1971 | Dent |
| 4138152 | February 1979 | Prue |
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a vehicle bumper showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a perspective view thereof with the top in open condition;
FIG. 3 is an end elevation view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a front elevation view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a rear elevation view thereof; and
FIG. 7 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 