Dual insulated bottle
Jones April 9, 1
U.S. patent number D316,013 [Application Number 07/369,669] was granted by the patent office on 1991-04-09 for dual insulated bottle. Invention is credited to Wiley Jones.
| United States Patent | D316,013 |
| Jones | April 9, 1991 |
Dual insulated bottle
Claims
The ornamental design for a dual insulated bottle, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Jones; Wiley (TX) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 07/369,669 |
| Filed: | June 21, 1989 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D7/608 |
| Field of Search: | ;D7/605-608 ;D9/399,355,353,347,341,377-378,387 ;62/457.1-457.4 ;215/12.1,13.1 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 3327881 | June 1967 | Maier |
| 3371807 | March 1968 | Clouser et al. |
| 3465905 | September 1969 | Schottanes |
Assistant Examiner: Pfeffer; Terry A.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Kearns; Jerry T.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a dual insulated bottle showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a left side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a right side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a top plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 