U.S. patent number D315,646 [Application Number 07/367,518] was granted by the patent office on 1991-03-26 for exercise bicycle seat. This patent grant is currently assigned to Bally Manufacturing Corporation. Invention is credited to Robert L. Hood.
United States Patent | D315,646 |
Hood | March 26, 1991 |
Inventors: | Hood; Robert L. (Grayslake, IL) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Bally Manufacturing Corporation
(Chicago, IL) |
Appl. No.: | 07/367,518 |
Filed: | June 16, 1989 |
Current U.S. Class: | D6/354 |
Field of Search: | ;D6/354 ;297/195,411 ;D21/194 ;D12/111 |
26069 | September 1896 | Munro |
27577 | August 1897 | Christy |
D237123 | October 1975 | Hogkvist |
D310113 | August 1990 | Stoner |
D311047 | October 1990 | Carnielli |
3220771 | November 1965 | Doss, Sr. |
3497258 | February 1970 | Hill |
4572575 | February 1986 | Golden et al. |
American Bicyclist & Mororcyclist, Aug. 1988, p. 74, Freestyle & Beach Cruiser Bicycle Seat (A). . Borneman Products Inc., Brochure, Dec. 1966, No. 935 Ladies Saddle Cushion and No. 350LZ Ladies and No. 7002 Junior Girls Saddle Cushions. . American Bicyclist & Motorcyclist, Mar. 1961, p. 54, No. 700 Junior Girls Bicycle Seat.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.