U.S. patent number D311,534 [Application Number 07/232,888] was granted by the patent office on 1990-10-23 for video tape recorder. This patent grant is currently assigned to Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba. Invention is credited to Kimiyoshi Ban, Shinji Komaba.
United States Patent | D311,534 |
Ban , et al. | October 23, 1990 |
Inventors: | Ban; Kimiyoshi (Kasukabe, JP), Komaba; Shinji (Kawaguchi, JP) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba
(Kawasaki, JP) |
Appl. No.: | 07/232,888 |
Filed: | August 16, 1988 |
Feb 22, 1988 [JP] | 63-6718 | |||
Current U.S. Class: | D14/135 |
Field of Search: | ;D14/124-126,129,134-136,156,160-165 |
D275566 | September 1984 | O'Leary |
D291689 | September 1987 | Nishiyama et al. |
D299452 | January 1989 | Yang |
D301881 | June 1989 | Yang |
59-07391 | Jul 1983 | JP | |||
66284 | Feb 1987 | KR | |||
HFD; 10/05/87; p. 126; Center--Shintom Model VCR-4010. . Video Review; Oct. 1987; p. 34; Top--Panasonic model PV-4770 VCR. . Video Review; Dec. 1986; p. 13; Bottom left--Magnavox model VR9565 VCR. . Video Review; Dec. 1987; p. 60; Top left--Hitachi model VT-2700A VCR. . Catalog of Hitachi Video Tape Recorder, VT-Z30, published Jul., 1987.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.