Aerial toy
Axelrod September 18, 1
U.S. patent number D310,691 [Application Number 07/136,922] was granted by the patent office on 1990-09-18 for aerial toy. Invention is credited to Herbert R. Axelrod.
| United States Patent | D310,691 |
| Axelrod | September 18, 1990 |
Aerial toy
Claims
The ornamental design for an aerial toy, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Axelrod; Herbert R. (Neptune, NJ) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 07/136,922 |
| Filed: | December 22, 1987 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D21/444 |
| Field of Search: | ;D21/82,85,86,87 ;D30/160 ;446/46 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D82235 | October 1930 | Wright |
| D241565 | September 1976 | Molenaar |
| 2194736 | March 1940 | DeBruler |
| 3359678 | December 1967 | Headrick |
| 4334385 | June 1982 | Melin et al. |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Fulwider, Patton, Reiber, Lee & Utecht
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an aerial toy showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof shown on an enlarged scale;
FIG. 3 is an end elevational view thereof the end opposite being identical;
FIG. 4 is a side elevational view thereof the side opposite being identical; and,
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 