Basketball possession indicator
Wolfe August 28, 1
U.S. patent number D310,176 [Application Number 07/223,779] was granted by the patent office on 1990-08-28 for basketball possession indicator. Invention is credited to Robert M. Wolfe.
| United States Patent | D310,176 |
| Wolfe | August 28, 1990 |
Basketball possession indicator
Claims
The ornamental design for a basketball possession indicator, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Wolfe; Robert M. (Raleigh, NC) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 07/223,779 |
| Filed: | July 25, 1988 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D10/46.1; D20/43 |
| Field of Search: | ;D10/104,109 ;116/20,327 ;273/1.5R,DIG.26,1.5A ;40/28R,125,65,67,63,64 ;33/349,351,366 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D248424 | July 1978 | Priovolos |
| 3444548 | May 1969 | Davis |
| 4904981 | February 1990 | Mele et al. |
Assistant Examiner: Jackson; Marcus
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a basketball possession indicator showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a right side elevational view of the design as seen in FIG. 1; and
FIG. 3 is a rear elevation view of the design as seen in FIG. 1, the bottom being plain and unornamental.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 