U.S. patent number D307,764 [Application Number 07/029,875] was granted by the patent office on 1990-05-08 for printer. This patent grant is currently assigned to Canon Kabushiki Kaisha. Invention is credited to Tatsuo Kojima.
United States Patent | D307,764 |
Kojima | May 8, 1990 |
Inventors: | Kojima; Tatsuo (Yokohama, JP) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha (Tokyo,
JP) |
Appl. No.: | 07/029,875 |
Filed: | March 25, 1987 |
Oct 2, 1986 [JP] | 61-39204 | |||
Current U.S. Class: | D18/55 |
Field of Search: | ;D14/111 ;D18/13,22,23,36,42 ;400/613.2-613.4,691-694,613.2 |
D250144 | October 1978 | Coppola |
D269274 | June 1983 | Hofland et al. |
D276051 | October 1984 | Kosako et al. |
D280723 | September 1985 | Nishida et al. |
D283900 | May 1986 | Hollerith, Jr. et al. |
D284006 | May 1986 | Freijd |
D287730 | January 1987 | Kojima et al. |
D291095 | July 1987 | Morozumi et al. |
D295856 | May 1988 | Hara |
D296906 | July 1988 | Burrows |
658401 | Aug 1985 | JP | |||
658402 | Aug 1985 | JP | |||
694446 | Dec 1986 | JP | |||
694744 | Dec 1986 | JP | |||
Digital's LN03 Laser Printer; .COPYRGT.1985. . Canon LBP-8II Laser Beam Printer; 1987. . Genicom 5010; 6/86.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.