Stapler
Tanigami November 7, 1
U.S. patent number D304,416 [Application Number 06/923,700] was granted by the patent office on 1989-11-07 for stapler. This patent grant is currently assigned to Elm Industry Co.. Invention is credited to Shintaro Tanigami.
| United States Patent | D304,416 |
| Tanigami | November 7, 1989 |
Stapler
Claims
The ornamental design for a stapler, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Tanigami; Shintaro (Tokyo, JP) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Elm Industry Co. (Tokyo,
JP) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/923,700 |
| Filed: | October 27, 1986 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| May 31, 1986 [JP] | 61-20944 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D8/49 |
| Field of Search: | ;D8/49-50 ;227/120,128,132 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D110801 | August 1938 | Crosby |
| D175762 | October 1955 | Deicken |
Assistant Examiner: Pfeffer; Terry A.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the stapler showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is another perspective view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a right side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a top plan view thereof; and
FIG. 7 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 